Visit fondia.com
  • Overview
  • Cases & Documents
  • Legal Health Check
  • Legal Insights

primary_areas

  • Home
  • Search
The content concerns Finnish legislation.
  1. Home⁠
  2. Contracts⁠
  3. The Main Principles of Contract Law⁠
  4. Contractual Negotiations⁠
  5. Contractual Negotiation in General
  1. Contractual Negotiations

Contractual Negotiation in General

Contractual negotiations include all acts undertaken by the parties before the actual contract is concluded. Contractual negotiations are generally not binding. No law regulates how contractual negotiations are to be carried out. Although contractual negotiations are non-binding they are nevertheless of legal significance. If the content of the contract is ambiguous, the negotiations may be turned to for help in interpretation.

Contractual negotiations do not always lead to the conclusion of a contract. Consequently, no legal obligations usually arise. If the contractual negotiations are frustrated for reasons clearly related to one party and that party never had an intention to conclude a contract or provided false or misleading information to the other party, such party may be ordered to pay the other party’s expenses incurred from the negotiations. Lost profits are, however, not compensated, as they are a part of the company’s business risk. It is, however, under very exceptional circumstances that one party can be ordered to pay the costs for frustrated negotiations. This is when one party has entered into the negotiations with the intention of damaging the other party or has clearly acted unreasonably. See the Finnish Supreme Court precedent KKO 2009:45 in [The Basis of Liability in Contractual Negotiations].

Related articles

  • The Basis of Liability in Contractual Negotiations

    Liability in contractual negotiations and miscarriage of negotiations usually only arises, when one party has carried out the negotiations carelessly or dishonestly. The issue of liability usually becomes relevant, when one party has negligently, i.e. intentionally or recklessly, caused loss to the other party.
    Read article
  • Good Negotiation Practice

    Good negotiation practice is based on the presumption that negotiations are undertaken in all seriousness. Carrying out negotiations with the sole aim of obtaining information about a competitor is regarded as bad practice. Appropriate provision of information is an integral part of good negotiation practice. Naturally, one must not provide the other party with false information. It is for example good to notify to the other party any changes in circumstances, which could affect the negotiations. The overall aim is to achieve a balance between the best possible result and, to a reasonable extent, the other party’s interests.
    Read article

We law your business.

Privacy⁠Privacy⁠
Cookies⁠Cookies⁠
Terms of Use⁠Terms of Use⁠
Contact us⁠Contact us⁠

Copyright © Fondia 2022. All rights reserved.